It is very common that people went through year of litigation and, the attorney offered your case a trial and, at last, you lost. Well, the mistake is taken by the plaintiff as he/she is responsible for choosing the trial lawyer in place of appeal lawyer.
So, here have a look at the reasons:
- Trial and appeals are two different things:
There is a very vast difference between taking a case to trial and pursuing an appeal as it involves many different procedures and experienced lawyer. A good and experienced civil appeal lawyer can argue errors during the trial mean to justify a second chance.
- As trial lawyers cannot handle appeals:
Due to the difference in the process of trial and appeal, the trial lawyer does no handle appeal cases. Well, there are also some chances that you can get a lawyer who can handle both.
- An appellate lawyer can offer a new way to your case:
Hiring a successful civil appeal lawyer can give you benefit as they will offer new perspective on your case. Experienced lawyers have their own mindsets and tendencies to deal with the situation. It is good to lose the sight from the smaller picture and focusing on bigger picture after spending months on the case.
- Might you will not require appealing again in the future:
In most of the cases, when you appeal a trial verdict then, you are appealing to an intermediate court. If in any case, you lose that appeal then, the case will go on another level of appellate review. And, in this circumstance, it is good to have a skilled civil appeal lawyer who can help you out from the problem.
So, make a wise decision while choosing the attorney for your case.